What is the test for understanding the meaning of a word or phrase in a communication between the parties?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Modugno v. Cira, et al., 2011 ONSC 3275 (CanLII):

Even the words that the parties used must be understood in their context or the circumstances in which they were used, given their inherent vagueness: see Dumbrell v. The Regional Group of Companies Inc., supra, per Doherty J.A. at para. 52.

Other Questions


What is the test for cross-purposes communication in the context of cross-party communication? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a party who has been unsuccessful in a personal injury case rely on their own financial means, such as cash, to avoid the costs of the other party? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for sufficient communication between a party and party? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a statement by one party that there is an inability to communicate with the other party preclude a joint custody order? (Ontario, Canada)
If a successful party accepts an offer to settle, can the successful party be ordered to pay all or part of the unsuccessful party’s costs? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a comment made by a party to a party’s communications entitled to be impugned as a matter of public interest? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the impact of a party’s email to the opposing party of a parenting motion for custody of the children? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the obligation of a party moving for an order that will affect the rights of the absent party to make full and fair disclosure of all material facts? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the requirement of uberrima fides apply when the parties have entered into a separation agreement requiring the parties to pay support for the children of the marriage? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a court award costs to a party who was more successful on an overall global basis than the other party? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.