What is the test for cross-purposes communication in the context of cross-party communication?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Lane v. Lane, 2002 CanLII 2794 (ON SC):
Here, unlike the circumstances in Mulrooney v. Barker (supra), there is no "mutual hostility between the parties who communicated at cross-purposes."
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does unconscionability in the matrimonial context apply to the commercial context? (Ontario, Canada)
In the context of the Divorce Act, what are some cases where the Court of Appeal has considered the meaning of notice in a family law context? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the defence of responsible communication in the context of a libel action brought by a newspaper? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for "discretionary discretion" in the context of a regulatory body's interpretation of legislation? (Ontario, Canada)
How has the deemed named insured provision been interpreted in the context of a motor vehicle accident claim? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for cross-examination in the context of evidence that contradicts an opposing witness? (Ontario, Canada)
How have courts dealt with the issue of negligence in the context of personal injury cases? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review in the context of a spouse's claim for spousal support? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for reasonable apprehension of bias in the context of an administrative board? (Ontario, Canada)
What constitutes “other fraudulent means” in the context of corporate fraud? (Ontario, Canada)
