Does the unanimity instruction apply in cases where multiple theories or acts may form the basis of a guilty verdict on one discrete crime?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Glenn, B267109 (Cal. App. 2017):

"[T]he unanimity instruction is appropriate 'when conviction on a single count could be based on two or more discrete criminal events,' but not 'where multiple theories or acts may form the basis of a guilty verdict on one discrete criminal event.' [Citation.] In deciding whether to give the instruction, the trial court must ask whether (1) there is a risk the jury may divide on two discrete crimes and not agree on any particular crime, or (2) the evidence merely presents the possibility the jury may divide, or be uncertain, as to the exact way the defendant is guilty of a single discrete crime. In the first situation, but not the second, it should give the unanimity instruction." (People v. Russo (2001) 25 Cal.4th 1124, 1132, 1135.)

Other Questions


What is the law on unanimity in a criminal case where the evidence of a crime is only a single crime but the evidence supports the theory of the crime? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who objected to an instruction and verdict form referencing a lying-in-wait theory of first degree murder continue to oppose the instruction and the verdict forms? (California, United States of America)
When a jury finds a defendant guilty of a single discrete crime, does the court have to give a unanimity instruction? (California, United States of America)
What is the basis for a finding of error in a trial court's refusal to instruct a jury to instruct on unanimity in a case where there were three distinct threats that could have constituted violations of section 422 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does the concept of unanimity apply to a defendant's motive for committing a crime or the theory underlying the crime? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of discretion standard apply to a decision by the appellate court to instruct or not to instruct a jury? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the jury be instructed that the crime of first degree murder requires unanimous agreement on a particular theory of murder? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a jury has been instructed to use the same or similar language as the standard instructions in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
What is the constitutional basis for a defendant's claim that a unanimous verdict is necessary in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have any authority or authority to instruct a jury to disregard an instruction in an assault case where the instruction had no antecedent in the facts? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.