Is there any case law where a jury has been instructed to use the same or similar language as the standard instructions in a personal injury case?

language because the standard instructions provide essentially similar advisements; moreover, some of the proposed instructional language erroneously would preclude a jury from having an emotional response, or is simply unnecessary to the jury's understanding of the case. (People v. Zamudio (2008) 43 Cal.4th 327, 369370, 75 Cal.Rptr.3d 289, 181 P.3d 105.)