Does the standard of review for the prejudice prong apply to counsel's performance?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Perkins, A145448 (Cal. App. 2016):
2. Perkins argues that the appropriate standard of review for the prejudice prong is whether counsel's performance was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt under Chapman v. California (1966) 386 U.S. 18. He provides no authority for this position, and we therefore do not consider it.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In reviewing a section 654 challenge, what standard of review does the court apply in reviewing the challenge? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing a claim of a violation of the constitutional right to confront, does the court apply the de novo standard of review? (California, United States of America)
If counsel discovered that the burglary had been reduced to a misdemeanor, and lodged an objection below, would counsel have discovered that counsel had discovered that Counsel had discovered it was a misdemeanor? (California, United States of America)
Can counsel be found to have failed to provide counsel with a proper performance review? (California, United States of America)
What standard of review applies to review of discovery orders? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied by the California Superior Court to review a public agency's decision for compliance with the CEQA? (California, United States of America)
How does the abuse of review standard of review apply? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied by a reviewing court to determine that a sentence is cruel and unusual? (California, United States of America)
How is the standard of review applied in a motion for sexual assault? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied by the Court in determining whether there was more than one objective? (California, United States of America)
