What is the standard of review applied by the Court in determining whether there was more than one objective?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Nunez, B222962 (Cal. App. 2011):
We apply a substantial evidence standard of review. "'The determination of whether there was more than one objective is a factual determination, which will not be reversed on appeal unless unsupported by the evidence presented at trial.' [Citations.] '[T]he law gives the trial court broad latitude in making this determination.' [Citation.]" (People v. Wynn (2010) 184 Cal.App.4th 1210, 1215.)
Page 22
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the standard of review applied by the Court of Appeal to determine whether a contract is ambiguous? (California, United States of America)
What is the de novo standard of review applied to determine whether the trial court erred in failing to instruct on a lesser included offense? (California, United States of America)
On appeal, can the court conduct an independent review of the transcript of the in camera hearing and the records reviewed by the trial court to determine whether any records were improperly withheld? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied by the Court of Appeal in determining whether a statute is constitutional or interpreted as a question of law? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied by a reviewing court to determine that a sentence is cruel and unusual? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a section 654 challenge, what standard of review does the court apply in reviewing the challenge? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied by the courts in determining whether a section of the California Civil Code is unconstitutional? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied by the Court of Appeal in determining whether to instruct a jury? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for the Court of Appeal to determine whether or not to instruct or admonish a jury in their supervision of a jury? (California, United States of America)
Whether a court's ruling is based on oral testimony or written declarations, when conflicting inferences can reasonably be drawn from the facts, can the appellate court defer to the trial court's factual determinations? (California, United States of America)
