Does the standard of review change when an administrative agency disagrees with the findings of a hearing officer?

MultiRegion, United States of America

The following excerpt is from N.L.R.B. v. International Broth. of Elec. Workers, Local 77, 895 F.2d 1570 (9th Cir. 1990):

The standard of review does not change when an administrative agency disagrees with the hearing officer; rather, the hearing officer's findings become part of the record for review to be weighed against the other evidence supporting the agency. Laipenieks v. INS, 750 F.2d 1427, 1429-30 (9th Cir.1985).

Other Questions


When a hearing officer disagrees with a decision made by the reviewing officer on the issues with which he disagreed with the hearing officer, how will the review officer's decision be considered? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a hearing officer, parole officer, hearing officer and parole official be immunized from prosecution? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If a court finds that a plaintiff has been denied a right to sue under a different legal standard than under the current standard of care, can the finding be reviewed? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applicable in a judicial review of a visa officer's decision? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
If a hearing officer fails to recommend discipline, would the hearing board or officer be powerless to impose sanctions? ("New York", United States of America)
What is the standard of review for a decision by a Public Prosecutions Officer (PRRA) not to be reviewed because it is considered "globally and as a whole"? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Can a decision maker such as the Immigration Officer on an application for permanent residents in Canada be reviewed on a higher standard of review of patent unreasonableness? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Is a visa officer's manager entitled to disagree with an officer's recommendation if the visa officer has not conducted an oral interview? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the applicable standard of review for an officer to determine whether or not they err by giving more weight to a statement by the Canadian migratory integrity officer in Port-au-Prince than the other documents submitted in evidence? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review of a finding that there had been no erroneous advice or administrative error? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.