Does the qualifying phrase "might hinder prosecution" apply to other words that might hinder prosecution?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from State Office of Inspector Gen. v. Superior Court, 10 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 13, 712, 117 Cal.Rptr.3d 388, 189 Cal.App.4th 695, 2 0 1, 38 Media L. Rep. 2409 (Cal. App. 2010):

"A longstanding rule of statutory constructionthe 'last antecedent rule'provides that 'qualifying words, phrases and clauses are to be applied to the *707 words or phrases immediately preceding and are not to be construed as extending to or including others more remote.' [Citations.]" ( White v. County of Sacramento (1982) 31 Cal.3d 676, 680, 183 Cal.Rptr. 520, 646 P.2d 191.) As applied here, this rule of statutory construction confirms that the qualifying phrase "might hinder prosecution" applies only to the immediately preceding phrase that gives the Inspector General discretion to redact or otherwise protect certain identifying information; it does not extend to the more remote phrase giving the Inspector General discretion "to decline to produce any of the underlying investigative materials."

Other Questions


How have courts interpreted the meaning of a word or phrase in the context of other words or phrases? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated the prosecution's proffer by the prosecution of opinions rendered by qualified experts using scientifically accepted methods of analysis? (California, United States of America)
Does the limitation period for malicious prosecution apply to malicious prosecution? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of qualifying words and phrases in section 667.6, subdivision (d) of the California Criminal Code, when a defendant is convicted of assault with intent to commit mayhem under Section 220 of the Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
Does section 654 of the California Criminal Code apply where the prosecution failed to charge one of the crimes at the outset, but then subsequently prosecuted on the subsequent charge of possessing a .22 handgun? (California, United States of America)
Does section 1157 of the California Criminal Code apply in a felony murder case prosecuted under a felony-murder theory? (California, United States of America)
Is a new federal constitutional rule for the conduct of criminal prosecutions, like that of the Payne case, to apply retroactively to all cases, state or federal? (California, United States of America)
Does the exclusionary rule apply to cases such as the one at bar in which the purpose of the police activity is neither the prosecution nor prevention of crime? (California, United States of America)
What standard of review applies to cases in which the prosecution relies primarily on circumstantial evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between a jury's belief in the prosecution and the jury's opinion that the prosecution argued planning and execution was not planning or execution? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.