Does the permissive language in Section 667.61 of the Penal Code undermine the other instructions requiring the prosecution to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Beltran, B229725 (Cal. App. 2012):

There is nothing in the permissive language of the instruction to support the interpretation suggested by defendant, nor does the instruction undercut the other instructions requiring the prosecution to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. As defendant acknowledges, his argument was rejected in People v. Hudson (2009) 175 Cal.App.4th 1025, 1028-1029. We agree with the holding in Hudson and reject the contention.

IV. Penal Code Section 667.61 Allegations in Counts 1 and 4

Other Questions


How has the jury been instructed on the prosecution's burden of proving a defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether the prosecution has proved beyond a reasonable doubt that an instructional error contributed to a jury's finding that a section 12022.53(b) enhancement was harmless? (California, United States of America)
Does the doctrine of reasonable doubt apply to a defendant's due process right to appeal against a jury verdict that diminished the prosecution's burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Does evidence code section 1108 reduce the prosecution's burden to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between a district attorney's instruction to a jury in a sexual assault case and the general burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Is there a reasonable likelihood that a jury would have understood the language of CALCRIM No. 370 to mean that motive is exempt from the rule requiring proof beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
How have courts instructed on reasonable doubt in the language of section 1096 of the Penal Code? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for giving a jury instructions that allow the prosecution to avoid the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have any authority to charge the jury on how to relate the evidence of that defense to the prosecution's general burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a jury interpret the instructions of a jury as permitting a conviction on a standard less than beyond beyond beyond the reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.