What is the test for giving a jury instructions that allow the prosecution to avoid the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Velasquez, F062517 (Cal. App. 2012):

"The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment denies States the power to deprive the accused of liberty unless the prosecution proves beyond a reasonable doubt every element of the charged offense. [Citation.] Jury instructions relieving States of this burden violate a defendant's due process rights. [Citations.] Such directions subvert the presumption of innocence accorded to accused persons and also invade the truth-finding task assigned solely to juries in criminal cases." (Carella v. California (1989)

Page 16

Other Questions


Does the doctrine of reasonable doubt apply to a defendant's due process right to appeal against a jury verdict that diminished the prosecution's burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
How has the jury been instructed on the prosecution's burden of proving a defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether the prosecution sustained its burden of proving the elements of a sentence enhancement beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a jury interpret the instructions of a jury as permitting a conviction on a standard less than beyond beyond beyond the reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have any authority to charge the jury on how to relate the evidence of that defense to the prosecution's general burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether the prosecution sustained its burden of proving the elements of a sentence enhancement beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether the prosecution sustained its burden of proving the elements of a sentence enhancement beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Is it improper for a prosecutor to misstate the law generally and particularly the prosecution's burden of proving every element of the crime charged beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Does evidence code section 1108 reduce the prosecution's burden to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether the prosecution sustained its burden of proving the elements of a sentence enhancement beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.