Does the exclusionary rule apply to exclude evidence that the search result was deliberate or deliberate?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Kidd, 248 Cal.Rptr.3d 234, 36 Cal.App.5th 12 (Cal. App. 2019):

People v. Macabeo (2016) 1 Cal.5th 1206, 1225-1226, 211 Cal.Rptr.3d 34, 384 P.3d 1189 [excluding evidence resulting from search that was "deliberate," rather than "the result of negligence" or from mistake in applying confusing and complex new law].) The trial court's suppression of the evidence in this case serves the policy objectives of the exclusionary rule as articulated in Robinson and Herring.

Other Questions


Does the exclusionary rule apply in determining the admissibility of evidence obtained in a probation search by the legal status of the probationer at the time of the search? (California, United States of America)
Does the exclusionary rule apply to evidence obtained as a direct result of an illegal search or seizure? (California, United States of America)
Does the exclusionary rule apply when an officer acting with objective good faith has obtained a search warrant for the search warrant under the Golden Gate Drive search warrant? (California, United States of America)
Does a search of a passenger's pocket by a deputy result in a search that would have resulted in the discovery of a gun? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing a ruling on a motion to exclude evidence from a search warrant, what is the test for determining whether the search did not violate the Fourth Amendment? (California, United States of America)
Does the exclusionary rule apply to suppress gun evidence obtained during a search? (California, United States of America)
Can deliberate omissions of material facts from an affidavit for a search warrant be used as evidence in the search warrant application? (California, United States of America)
In a motion for summary adjudication on a motion to exclude evidence as to drainage, does plaintiff need to explain to the arbitrator why it was necessary to exclude the evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court have authority to exclude evidence where a defendant has been found to be contrary to the evidence code under section 352 of the California Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
Does the exclusionary rule apply to evidence seized at the time of the search? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.