Does the doctrine of common law apply in this case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Ventura County Nat. Bank v. Macker, 49 Cal.App.4th 1528, 57 Cal.Rptr.2d 418 (Cal. App. 1996):
Nor does similar dicta in other cases also involving different issues. (See Bowden v. Robinson (1977) 67 Cal.App.3d 705, 716, 136 Cal.Rptr. 871; Tijsseling v. General Acc., etc., Assur. Corp. (1976) 55 Cal.App.3d 623, 627, fn. 1, 127 Cal.Rptr. 681.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When a judge refers to "common sense, common-sense, popular parlance" or "common-sense", does this mean that the judge must be able to rely solely on common sense or common- sense? (California, United States of America)
What is the law of the case doctrine and what is the effect of the law-of-the case doctrine? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
Does the provocative act murder doctrine apply when the felony-murder doctrine does not apply? (California, United States of America)
How does the prosecution in a civil case establish that there is a connection between a group of individuals with a common name, common identifying symbols and a common enemy? (California, United States of America)
Is a new federal constitutional rule for the conduct of criminal prosecutions, like that of the Payne case, to apply retroactively to all cases, state or federal? (California, United States of America)
Does the res judicata doctrine apply in this case? (California, United States of America)
Does the doctrine of the lesser included offense doctrine apply to a defendant who has pleaded guilty to a charge of a related but not necessarily included crime? (California, United States of America)
Does the doctrine of implied acquittal apply to cases in which the jury deadlocked on the greater offence? (California, United States of America)
