Does the burden of proof need to be reviewed de novo?

MultiRegion, United States of America

The following excerpt is from Cashman v. U.S., 931 F.2d 896 (9th Cir. 1991):

Whether the district court properly imposed the burden of proof is a question of law reviewed de novo. See United States v. Janis, 428 U.S. 433, 440-43 (1976) (implies this is an issue of law).

Other Questions


In reviewing the application of a sophisticated means enhancement, what is the difference between a de novo review and a clear error review? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the doctrine of abuse of review or de novo review apply? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the burden of proof and what is the threshold of proof? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the burden-shifting and enhanced burden of proof of a fiduciary relationship? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
For the purposes of denying a motion for judicial review of a decision by the Board of Arbitration for Justice denying an application to review the denial of the motion, in what circumstances will the motion be reviewed? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the burden of proof and the evidential burden in medical malpractice cases? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Is a petitioner who has procedurally defaulted by not raising a claim on direct review or collateral review barred from raising it on collateral review? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When reviewing the dismissal of a complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, how do we review the factual findings and legal conclusions de novo? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the burden of a trial court of giving de novo review to factual findings? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a review of denial of ERISA benefits a de novo review? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.