What is the burden of a trial court of giving de novo review to factual findings?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Craig v. Ducart, Case No.: 3:16-cv-02531-GPC-KSC (S.D. Cal. 2019):
trial court of its burden to give de novo review to factual findings; conclusions of law must still be reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a factual finding from a state court relevant to the federal court review if the relevant record is unavailable for review? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When reviewing a district court's confirmation of an arbitral award, does the court need to review a finding of fact for "clear error"? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When reviewing a conclusion by a state court on a mixed issue involving questions both of fact and law, does the court have to give the state court full deference? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When assessing the evidence presented at trial, does a reviewing court need to conduct a thorough review of the state court record? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the findings of a federal court's findings of fact and conclusions of law de novo? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In a federal habeas proceeding concerning a state prisoner, is a federal court required to presume that a state court's factual findings are correct? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a petitioner who has had a full and fair review of his Fourth Amendment claims in state court seek to have those claims reviewed by the federal appeals court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for an application to compel the Court to approve the publication of both the findings of an independent review and the analysis of both findings? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
When reviewing a denial of a motion to suppress, how do we review the findings of the previous district court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts reviewed the findings of the Court of Appeal on jurisdictional issues? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
