Does the Attorney General have any basis to argue that the Defendant was a major participant in the underlying felony?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Miller, A159345 (Cal. App. 2021):

Defendant asserts the trial court did not engage in independent fact finding, but rather effectively employed a substantial evidence standard. The Attorney General maintains the trial court did make findings, guided by the principles in People v. Banks (2015) 61 Cal.4th 788 (Banks), that defendant was a major participant in the underlying felony and also acted with reckless indifference to human life, and therefore properly denied the resentencing petition.

The pertinent parts of the record are as follows:

Other Questions


Does the question of whether a defendant was a major participant in the underlying felony and acted with reckless indifference to human life apply only to defendants convicted of felony murder? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have any authority or authority to argue that a defendant's attorney is incompetent? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have any grounds to argue that the Defendant failed to plead that he had committed a sexual assault against the Defendant? (California, United States of America)
How have the Attorney General argued that the Court of Appeal invited error in giving instructions on application of the reasonable doubt principle to a lesser included homicide defendant? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have any grounds to deny a defendant's ability to pay his attorney fees? (California, United States of America)
Can a letter between the Attorney General and Attorney General be admitted as a public record? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have any grounds to argue that the jury was confused by the fact that rape felony murder requires a specific intent to rape? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the Attorney General find that defendant waived the right to have a supplemental brief arguing that the death qualification process is unconstitutional? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have any basis to argue that petitioner is guilty of laches? (California, United States of America)
How has the Attorney General argued that the sentences for each count of assault and assault against a defendant have to be evaluated separately? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.