How has the Attorney General argued that the sentences for each count of assault and assault against a defendant have to be evaluated separately?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Fontenot, D074575 (Cal. App. 2019):
The Attorney General relies on People v. Brasure (2008) 42 Cal.4th 1037 (Brasure) to argue the sentences for each count should be evaluated separately to determine the applicability of the parole restitution fine. In Brasure, the defendant was
Page 13
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the Attorney General have any grounds to argue that the Defendant failed to plead that he had committed a sexual assault against the Defendant? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have any grounds to argue that a defendant was convicted of assault with intent to commit rape on both counts? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have a valid case to argue that the only circumstances in aggravation listed in both the probation report and the sentencing memorandum submitted by the district attorney are the circumstances in which the sentence was imposed? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General's abstract of judgment reflect the oral pronouncement that defendant's sentence for the offense charged as count 4 is to be served concurrently with the base term count? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have any obligation to oppose the sentencing of a defendant who failed to object at the time of sentencing? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have the authority to argue that a sentencing based on post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) must be considered as a mitigating factor in sentencing? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant challenge his sentence for assault against the Attorney General? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have the authority to disqualify a defendant from appealing against his sentence for assault with a deadly weapon? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have any grounds to argue that the imposition of the upper term of a sentence for assault was an abuse of power? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have authority to argue that the trial court intended to impose a consecutive sentence on count 11? (California, United States of America)
