Does section 654 of the California Code of Civil Procedure prohibit multiple prosecutions?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Morris, 237 Cal.App.2d 773, 47 Cal.Rptr. 253 (Cal. App. 1965):

Neal v. State of California, supra, 55 Cal.2d 11, 9 Cal.Rptr. 607, 357 P.2d 839 declares the rule against multiple prosecutions to be a procedural safeguard against harassment. In that respect the rule does not [237 Cal.App.2d 794] rest exclusively upon section 654. The language of section 654 itself does not extend the rule against multiple prosecutions beyond the limits of the rule against multiple punishments. The proscription against harassment through multiple prosecutions finds support also in the constitutional right to due process and the equal protection of the laws.

Other Questions


Does Section 1054(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure, section 1054 et. seq. and section 854 of the Criminal Code, allow defense counsel to conduct their investigation and prepare for trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for Section 654 of the California Criminal Code when a defendant is found guilty of a breach of section 654 or section 744 of the Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
Does section 12022.7 of the California Code of Civil Procedure prohibit the use of language that is "controversial, offensive or offensive" in the context of civil litigation? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 139 of the California Civil Code, section 139 2 of the S.C. Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
Is there an exception to section 654 of section 667.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure to allow for multiple sentences for sex crimes committed during an indivisible transaction? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for multiple violations under section 654 of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 186.22 of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure (i.e. section 186. 22) Violate Due Process? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be convicted of violating section 148(a)(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure if the jury found a completed violation of section 148 prior to the officers' use of excessive force? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court strike down a section of the Civil Rights Act that prohibits the use of certain types of civil rights, such as civil liberties, as well as those of the individual, in the context of civil liberties? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant in a civil action be found to have breached section 425.16, subdivision (e) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.