Does Section 425.16 of the California Code of Civil Procedure provide anti-SLAPP protection?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Cotton v. Cotton, A139072 (Cal. App. 2014):
anti-SLAPP protection under clauses (1) and (2) of section 425.16, subdivision (e)unlike clauses (3) and (4)do not have a limitation that the speech or petitioning rights concern an issue of public interest. (Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & Opportunity (1999) 19 Cal.4th 1106, 1117-1118.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the active participation provision in section 654 of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure provide an exemption to the application for Section 654? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 1054(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure, section 1054 et. seq. and section 854 of the Criminal Code, allow defense counsel to conduct their investigation and prepare for trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for Section 654 of the California Criminal Code when a defendant is found guilty of a breach of section 654 or section 744 of the Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant in a civil action be found to have breached section 425.16, subdivision (e) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be convicted of violating section 148(a)(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure if the jury found a completed violation of section 148 prior to the officers' use of excessive force? (California, United States of America)
Does section 394 of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure apply to the California Department of Justice? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between section 1111 of the California Code of Civil Procedure and the wording of Section 1111, which provides that "a conviction cannot be had upon the testimony of an accomplice unless it be corroborated by such other evidence"? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 186.22 of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure (i.e. section 186. 22) Violate Due Process? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 139 of the California Civil Code, section 139 2 of the S.C. Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
Does section 1109 of the California Domestic Violence Act, section 352 of the Code of Civil Procedure, provide a "safeguard against the use of other acts of domestic violence"? (California, United States of America)
