Does section 352 as to evidence that would consume undue time violate a defendant's right to confront the witnesses against him?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Butler, D073612 (Cal. App. 2018):
application of Evidence Code section 352 to exclude the evidence did not infringe defendant's constitutional right to confront the witnesses against him." (Ibid.; see People v. Pearson (2013) 56 Cal.4th 393, 455 [defendant's confrontation clause rights were not violated by the exclusion of evidence under Evidence Code section 352 as to evidence of marginal value that would consume undue time].)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a defendant's reliance on evidence code section 730 of the Evidence Code Section 730 a violation of his constitutional right to access a mental health expert? (California, United States of America)
Does the application of "ordinary rules of evidence" such as section 352 of California Evidence Code section 352 violate a defendant's constitutional rights? (California, United States of America)
Does a limitation on cross-examining a prosecution witness at trial violate a defendant's right to confront the witness? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law supporting a defendant's contention that the trial court violated his constitutional right to confront witnesses in the witness box? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's right to due process violated when evidence of a witness's identification of that defendant is admitted? (California, United States of America)
Does the admission of evidence in a medical malpractice case violate a defendant's right to confront the witnesses against him under the Sixth Amendment? (California, United States of America)
Does admitting evidence pursuant to California Evidence Code section 1237 impermissibly deny defendants their constitutional rights to confrontation and cross-examination? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant argue that admitting the evidence in a civil case would have violated his federal confrontation rights? (California, United States of America)
Does exclusion of evidence at trial violate a defendant's constitutional right to confront and cross-examine witnesses? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's right to due process violated when evidence of a witness's identification of that defendant is admitted? (California, United States of America)
