Does Section 1985(2) of the California Civil Code require access to federal courts?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Bashkin v. San Diego County, CASE NO. 08cv1450-WQH-WVG (S.D. Cal. 2011):
2. "Section 1985(2) contains two clauses that give rise to separate causes of action." Portman v. County of Santa Clara, 995 F.2d 898, 908-909 (9th Cir. 1993). The first clause concerns access to federal courts, giving rise to a cause of action where:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does section 1431.2 of the California Civil Code prohibit damages under California Code of Civil Procedure section 877 from being calculated as "economic damages" rather than as damages for personal injury? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does Section 5G1.3 of the Federal Guidelines for Federal Sentences apply to a defendant who is convicted of a federal charge of possession of a firearm by a federal court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a federal government official be held liable for civil damages in a civil case brought by a plaintiff who was not aware of the impact of the actions of a federal civil servant on her client's civil rights? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a court of appeal's rejection of an insufficiency of evidence claim under section 21 of the Civil Code of Civil Procedure apply to the federal courts? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Under Section 1235 of the Civil Code of Civil Procedure, what is the impact of section 1235 on a plaintiff's ability to access access to the Commissioner's office? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for a federal district court to determine whether a state court or federal court has jurisdiction to rule on a federal Railroad Commission case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a state court have the authority to interpret the findings of a federal court when determining whether a federal judge has found that a state judge has jurisdiction to interpret a federal finding? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a state court have more latitude than a federal court to reasonably determine that a defendant has not satisfied the standard of conduct required for a motion to be heard in a civil case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for a federal court to determine whether a section of the Civil Code of Civil Procedure has been interpreted as unconstitutional? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How has Section 654(b)(2) of the Civil Code of Civil Procedure been interpreted by a federal court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
