California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Singleton, A148969 (Cal. App. 2018):
The admission of evidence under section 1240 does not implicate an accused's federal constitutional rights to due process and confrontation of witnesses. (People v. Merriman (2014) 60 Cal.4th 1, 67.) Thus, ordinarily the admission of evidence not authorized by section 1240 is subject to review only for state law error. (Id. at p. 70;
Page 12
People v. Partida (2005) 37 Cal.4th 428, 439.) "Whether an out-of-court statement meets the statutory requirements for admission as a spontaneous statement is generally a question of fact for the trial court, the determination of which involves an exercise of the court's discretion. [Citation.] We will uphold the trial court's determination of facts when they are supported by substantial evidence and review for abuse of discretion its decision to admit evidence under the spontaneous statement exception." (People v. Merriman, supra, at p. 65.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.