The following excerpt is from Scott v. Fischer, 616 F.3d 100 (2nd Cir. 2010):
4 Neither Scott nor the defendants ask us to review the district court's ruling as to the Younger, Pullman, and Colorado River abstention doctrines, exhaustion of her state remedies, or the application of the statute of limitations. Accordingly, we deem any such arguments waived and do not address those issues further below. See Norton v. Sam's Club, 145 F.3d 114, 117 (2d Cir.1998).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.