Does recreational use immunity apply to a homeowner who rents a home with a maintained swimming pool?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Wang v. Nibbelink, 208 Cal.Rptr.3d 461, 4 Cal.App.5th 1 (Cal. App. 2016):
Plaintiffs' reply brief cites an opinionJohnson v. Prasad (2014) 224 Cal.App.4th 74, 168 Cal.Rptr.3d 196 filed after the filing of respondents' brief in this appeal. That case did not involve recreational use immunity. Rather, we there held that homeowners who knowingly rented a home with a maintained swimming pool owed a duty of care under section 1714 to protect
[4 Cal.App.5th 27]
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a state have immunity from liability under the state immunity principle? (California, United States of America)
Does the immunity rule apply to the sanity phase? (California, United States of America)
Does immunity granted by a federal court grant a witness immunity from prosecution for later use of their testimony? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted immunity clauses in witness immunity agreements? (California, United States of America)
Does the judicial deference rule apply to the actions of the board of a homeowners association? (California, United States of America)
Does the agent's immunity rule apply to a claim for interference with contract rights? (California, United States of America)
Does primary assumption of risk apply to recreational activities such as tubing and water skiing? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted immunity clauses in witness immunity agreements? (California, United States of America)
Does our decision not to grant a state official immunity from liability in a medical malpractice case affect the immunity granted to a state employee? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a homeowner who hires an unlicensed employee as an employee under section 2750.5 of the California Code of Civil Procedure (i.e. workers' compensation and general liability) is liable to the homeowner? (California, United States of America)
