Is there any case law where a homeowner who hires an unlicensed employee as an employee under section 2750.5 of the California Code of Civil Procedure (i.e. workers' compensation and general liability) is liable to the homeowner?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Rosas v. Dishong, 67 Cal.App.4th 815, 79 Cal.Rptr.2d 339 (Cal. App. 1998):

Moreover, finding Rosas to be an employee under section 2750.5 furthers the policies identified in Foss v. Anthony Industries, supra, 139 Cal.App.3d 794, 189 Cal.Rptr. 31, i.e., 1) imposing liability on the one benefited by the labor and capable of spreading the risk through insurance; and 2) encouraging the hiring of workers with the competence and financial responsibility necessary to obtain a license. It is evident that potential tort liability for hiring an unlicensed worker to do a job requiring a license encourages a homeowner to hire a licensed worker. As to spreading the risk through insurance, all California comprehensive personal liability insurance policies must provide coverage for workers' compensation claims as well as general liability insurance. (Ins.Code, 11590.) Whether an injured worker recovers through workers' compensation coverage or through general liability coverage, liability is still imposed on the homeowner benefiting from the work and able to spread the risk through the purchase of a comprehensive homeowners' liability policy.

Page 344

Other Questions


Does section 2750.5 of the Workers' Compensation Act grant immunity from liability in a personal injury action at law even if the employer's insurer is not responsible for payment of workers' compensation benefits to the injured employee? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 1054(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure, section 1054 et. seq. and section 854 of the Criminal Code, allow defense counsel to conduct their investigation and prepare for trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test to determine whether a corporate officer, director, and stockholder or employee is liable to a third party for breach of section 354 of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 139 of the California Civil Code, section 139 2 of the S.C. Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 186.22 of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure (i.e. section 186. 22) Violate Due Process? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 830.6(1) of the California Highway Code of Civil Procedure when determining whether a defendant is immune from liability under the California Motor Vehicle Act? (California, United States of America)
Is liability under section 13385 of the California Civil Code for polluting the environment limited to a public entity's liability under Section 13350, subdivision (a) of the Government Code? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be convicted of violating section 148(a)(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure if the jury found a completed violation of section 148 prior to the officers' use of excessive force? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 19996.2(a) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure when determining whether an employee has been on an unauthorized leave for a period of time? (California, United States of America)
Is section 8 of the California Code of Civil Procedure sufficient to grant employees and independent contractors rights against private parties who hire them? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.