Does majority rule of the children govern?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Estate of Jimenez, 56 Cal.App.4th 733, 65 Cal.Rptr.2d 710 (Cal. App. 1997):
2 In a case remarkably like this one, involving four surviving children one of whom objected, the court indicated that majority rule of the children governs. (Smith v. Vidovich (1966) 242 Cal.App.2d 206, 207, 51 Cal.Rptr. 196.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is the conduct of a private citizen who acts in cooperation with or at the direction of a government agent a government action in applying the exclusionary evidence rule? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law that discriminates against non-marital children when it comes to the status of "illegitimate children"? (California, United States of America)
What is the proper rule governing equitable estoppel against the government? (California, United States of America)
What is the proper rule governing equitable estoppel against the government? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for making a government claim for money or damages under the Government Claims Act? (California, United States of America)
Is a parent of two children in a children's home charged with attempted murder? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between a majority and a majority in making a general obligation bond financing decision? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court have the authority to require the federal government to pay an appellate filing fee for the purposes of maintaining the government's financial integrity and resources? (California, United States of America)
Is a father's claim that the court's order granting mother sole legal and physical custody of their children violates his right to see his children? (California, United States of America)
How have the majority responded to a dissent from the Court of Appeal in a case where the majority found that the absence of prejudice was sufficient to justify a finding of excusable neglect? (California, United States of America)
