California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Garza v. Garcia, H040889 (Cal. App. 2015):
In his reply brief, appellant states, "[f]or a plaintiff who is a novice and not versed in the law I have been as diligent in this action as any paid attorney." While we are sympathetic to the challenges facing appellant as a pro per, the fact that appellant is representing himself does not diminish his burden to establish error on appeal. The law permits a party to act as his or her own attorney, however, " '[s]uch a party is to be treated like any other party and is entitled to the same, but no greater[,] consideration than other litigants and attorneys. [Citation.]' [Citation.] Thus, as is the case with attorneys, pro[] per[] litigants must follow correct rules of procedure. [Citations.]" (Nwosu v. Uba (2004) 122 Cal.App.4th 1229, 1247.)
The judgment is affirmed.
Page 6
/s/_________
RUSHING, P.J.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.