When a party appeals following a determination of abuse or nonabuse by an administrative agency, does the appellant have to follow the decision by the trial court?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from L. A. Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't v. L. A. Cnty. Civil Serv. Comm'n, B268599 (Cal. App. 2017):

When a party appeals following a trial court's determination of abuse or nonabuse of discretion by an administrative agency, the "'appellate court gives no deference to the trial court's determination. It makes its own determination, de novo.'" (Pollak v. State Personnel Bd. (2001) 88 Cal.App.4th 1394, 1404.) This does not mean that the appellate court "'independently or "de novo" determine[s] penalty.'" (Ibid.) The court "'"cannot substitute its discretion for that of the administrative agency on the degree of punishment to be imposed." [Citation.]' [Citation.]" (Ibid.)

Other Questions


In reviewing the severity of discipline imposed by an administrative body in a mandamus proceeding, does the court need to consider the correctness of the decision of the administrative agency rather than that of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, does the appellate court have power to substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, does the appellate court have power to substitute its factual determination for that factual determination? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
How does the Court of Appeal review decisions of the administrative and trial courts? (California, United States of America)
How will the courts review a trial court's decision to exclude evidence for abuse of abuse of power? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of the Court of Appeal's decision to stay the trial court's writ of mandate and all proceedings below, pending an appeal? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General's assertion that appellate courts review probation conditions for abuse of abuse of power, if the issue was raised in the trial court? (California, United States of America)
In a motion to dismiss one or both of appellant's prior strike convictions, can appellant appeal against the finding that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.