California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Continental Ins. Co. v. Lexington Ins. Co., 55 Cal.App.4th 637, 64 Cal.Rptr.2d 116 (Cal. App. 1997):
We are therefore called upon to determine whether an umbrella policy, providing only excess insurance for the occurrence involved here, must prorate or otherwise contribute concurrently with a primary policy which, by operation of a contingency clause, in essence becomes an excess policy. In doing so, we are mindful of the basic rule that in interpreting policies of insurance, "[t]he policy will be viewed in light of its general objects and purposes." (Otter v. General Ins. Co. (1973) 34 Cal.App.3d 940, 949, 109 Cal.Rptr. 831.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.