The following excerpt is from Ahmed v. Holder, 11-2194-ag NAC (2nd Cir. 2012):
repeated that he had been beaten in a sworn statement. See Majidi v. Gonzales, 430 F.3d 77, 80-81 (2d Cir. 2005)(the agency need not credit an applicant's explanations for inconsistent testimony unless those explanations would compel a reasonable fact-finder to do so).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.