Does a trial court abuse its discretion in denying a defendant's motion to withdraw his plea?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Robinson, A158749 (Cal. App. 2020):

We therefore conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's motion to withdraw his plea. (See People v. Ravaux (2006) 142 Cal.App.4th 914, 917-918 [no abuse of discretion where defendant "indicated numerous times that he understood the consequences of the guilty plea and the rights he was waiving," he "completed the plea form, attesting that he understood and accepted fully the plea agreement and the rights he was required to waive in order to accept the deal," and while in front of the court, "was again apprised of his rights, informed of the consequences of a

Page 8

Other Questions


Does a motion for a new trial need to be denied because the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for new trial? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant obtain a new trial on the grounds that the trial court did not abuse its discretion to deny the motion on the same grounds as the previous motion? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for abuse of discretion in the context of a motion to review the decision of a trial court denying a defendant's motion to exclude victim impact evidence and uncharged misconduct in the case of Romero? (California, United States of America)
In arguing that the trial court abused its power to deny a motion to sever an indecent exposure charge from a sexual assault charge, does defendant rely on Earle v Earle to argue that the motion was abused? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for denying a motion for a new trial on the grounds that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in denying the motion under the first two grounds? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant withdraws his plea to withdraw his plea prior to sentencing and claims his court-appointed counsel was prejudicially ineffective, what is the test for withdrawing his plea? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court abuse its discretion when it denied a defendant's motion to exclude the testimony of Page 35 of the Defendant's lawyer as more prejudicial than probative? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant withdraws his plea to withdraw his plea prior to sentencing and claims his court-appointed counsel was prejudicially ineffective, what is the test for withdrawing his plea? (California, United States of America)
In denying a motion to withdraw a no contest plea, does the trial court abuse its discretion? (California, United States of America)
Does a trial court's decision to deny leave to amend for an abuse of discretion in a motion to amend a motion? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.