Does a restaurant have an obligation to keep a public crosswalk in a reasonably safe condition?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Seaber v. Hotel Del Coronado, 1 Cal.App.4th 481, 2 Cal.Rptr.2d 405 (Cal. App. 1991):
6 Nor does its patrons' use of the public crosswalk, consistent with the right of anyone to use it, result in any exclusive right to such use giving rise to an obligation to keep it in a reasonably safe condition. (Ellsworth v. Colorado Beverage Company (1962) 150 Colo. 19, 370 P.2d 159, 160-161.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for determining whether a public entity is liable for a dangerous condition of public property? (California, United States of America)
Does a public entity have a duty to take reasonable steps to protect the public from the danger? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have to object at sentencing to the reasonableness of a probation condition before he can challenge the condition on appeal? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for whether a party obligated to perform services has reasonably performed that obligation? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between a reasonable and unreasonable plaintiff and a reasonable plaintiff under a "reasonable implied assumption of risk" approach? (California, United States of America)
Is it a crime for anyone to engage in a lewd act in any public place open to the public or exposed to public view? (California, United States of America)
What is a lawyer's obligation to take reasonable steps to avoid reasonably foreseeable prejudice upon withdrawing from representation of a client? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing a reasonable relationship between the condition imposed, and the general public benefit? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for evidence that the appellant could reasonably reasonably reasonably expect the appellant to have knowledge of a crime? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a reasonable probability of a more favourable result under the reasonable beyond reasonable doubt standard? (California, United States of America)
