What is the test for whether a party obligated to perform services has reasonably performed that obligation?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Coleman v. Mora, 263 Cal.App.2d 137, 69 Cal.Rptr. 166 (Cal. App. 1968):
The question whether a party obligated to perform services has reasonably performed that obligation is one for the trial court. (Meyers v. Nolan, supra, 18 Cal.App.2d 319, 323, 63 P.2d 1216.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for reasonable expectation of privacy under the Fourth Amendment when an overnight guest is found to have been a party to a party in the home of the party's landlord? (California, United States of America)
What is the "reasonable person" standard in determining whether a person is a reasonable person? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for evidence that the appellant could reasonably reasonably reasonably expect the appellant to have knowledge of a crime? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant's reasonableness of their conduct is reasonable? (California, United States of America)
What is a lawyer's obligation to take reasonable steps to avoid reasonably foreseeable prejudice upon withdrawing from representation of a client? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a party can appeal against a finding that a party to the Cannabis Control Act is acting unlawfully? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant can reasonably have reasonably anticipated the events leading up to the action? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a party has a valid claim against the other party? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between a reasonable and unreasonable plaintiff and a reasonable plaintiff under a "reasonable implied assumption of risk" approach? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
