Does a psychologist or psychiatrist have to be an expert witness at a long-term commitment extension trial?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Kerbs, 258 Cal.Rptr.3d 67 (Cal. App. 2020):

4 It is curious that the public defender in this case did not seek the assistance of a psychologist or psychiatrist as an expert witness, considering that an NGI defendant in a commitment extension trial is entitled to the same such assistance as a defendant in a criminal trial. (See 1026.5, subd. (b)(7) ; cf. People v. Mitchell (2005) 127 Cal.App.4th 936, 941, 26 Cal.Rptr.3d 163.)

Other Questions


When a witness at the preliminary hearing is unable to testify at trial, can the former witness be used at trial? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who does not have a written waiver allowing him to attend the criminal trial of a witness be present at the trial of the witness? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court instruct the jury on the limited admissibility of statements relied on by Edinger, the expert who gave evidence at trial on the basis of an expert opinion? (California, United States of America)
Does the fact that expert testimony may be available at trial require defense counsel to consult the experts or present their testimony at trial? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's claim that the trial court's failure to provide him with the means and subpoena witnesses to defend at trial a violation of his Sixth Amendment right to represent himself at trial reversible? (California, United States of America)
What are the principles of a motion for a new trial where a witness in a murder trial later dies before the trial has even begun? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a trial judge to proceed with the trial of a defendant under section 1368 of the California Mental Health Act if the trial judge receives the reports of two psychiatrists? (California, United States of America)
Can an expert be cross-examined more extensively than a lay witness? (California, United States of America)
When a trial court makes disparaging or disparaging remarks to the defense counsel or witnesses, is it necessary for a new trial? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.