Does a Miranda warning need to be issued under the Tarantino rule?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Baker, 210 Cal.App.3d 681, 258 Cal.Rptr. 621 (Cal. App. 1989):
In People v. Harris (1987) 192 Cal.App.3d 943, 949, 237 Cal.Rptr. 747, the court reasoned that since section 1369 competency examinations cannot be used against the defendant under the Tarantino rule, a Miranda warning is not necessary.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the current state of the law in the context of the Miranda Miranda Miranda warning? (California, United States of America)
Does the use of the Miranda Miranda Miranda Rule apply to information that is not in the context of criminal activity? (California, United States of America)
Does a prison officer have to issue a Miranda warning to an inmate to coerce him into participating in an interrogation? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing a trial court's decision on the Miranda issue, does the court have to agree that a statement was obtained in violation of the Miranda Act? (California, United States of America)
What effect would Miranda warnings have on the exclusionary rule of search and seizure? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of a court ruling that a defendant did not receive a Miranda warning? (California, United States of America)
Does a suspect who has received and understood the Miranda warning, and has not invoked his Miranda rights, waives his right to remain silent by making an uncoerced statement to the police? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the Miranda Miranda Miranda Statement? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted Miranda warnings in the context of the Miranda waiver? (California, United States of America)
Under what procedural safeguards under the Miranda Miranda, or otherwise, does a suspect have to be warned that he has a right to remain silent, that any statement he makes may be used as evidence against him? (California, United States of America)
