Does a minor have the capacity to commit a crime?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. J.R. (In re J.R.), B263729 (Cal. App. 2016):

California law presumes children under 14 do not have the capacity to commit a crime. The provision in Penal Code section 26, paragraph One, " 'All persons are capable of committing crimes except those belonging to the following classes: [] One-Children under the age of 14, in the absence of clear proof that at the time of committing the act charged against them, they knew its wrongfulness,' " establishes a " 'presumption of a minor's incapacity.' " (People v. Lewis (2001) 26 Cal.4th 334, 378 (Lewis).)

Page 7

Other Questions


When a defendant admits committing a crime but denies the necessary intent for the charged crime because of mistake or accident, is intent to commit the crime admissible? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a finding that a crime committed by appellant was committed with the specific intent to commit a crime against a specific gang member? (California, United States of America)
If a criminal commits a crime in a different county than the one where the crime was committed, would that change the outcome of the criminal trial if the crime occurred in the other county? (California, United States of America)
When a minor is convicted of a crime committed as a minor, what is the impact of that minor's remoteness? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury use uncharged crime evidence to determine that defendant was more likely to have committed the charged crimes because he committed the uncharged crimes? (California, United States of America)
Is an assault committed as an attempt to commit a crime separate and distinct from a crime? (California, United States of America)
Is the natural and probable consequences doctrine applied to a crime committed before the crime was committed? (California, United States of America)
Is a person who aids or abets a crime liable for the crime if the original crime was committed independently by another person? (California, United States of America)
Does a statute retroactively increase the punishment for a crime committed after the crime has been committed violate the ex post facto clause? (California, United States of America)
Can the actual killer be held liable as an accessory on the theory that he encouraged the murder victim to commit the crime after he had committed the crime? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.