Does a jury have a duty to receive and record a verdict of acquittal?

of sex crimes against two children but found not true enhancement allegations that multiple victims were involved; trial court impermissibly invited jury to reconsider not true findings and allowed jurors to deliberate anew]; Bigelow v. Superior Court (1989) 208 Cal.App.3d 1127, 1129, 1133, 1135 [jury acquitted defendant of murder, but found true special circumstance allegations; by denying defendant's motion to receive and record verdict and sending jury out for further deliberations, trial court improperly directed jury to reconsider verdict of acquittal].)

"The touchstone of a jury verdict of acquittal is the jury's manifestation of a definite and final intent to acquit of the offense. [Citations.] [] . . . Once it is clear that the jury's intent is to acquit, the form of the verdict is not important; it is the intention to acquit that triggers the mandatory duty to receive and record the verdict and acquit the prisoner. 'The record ends with the finding of the jury not guilty.' [Citation.]" (Bigelow v. Superior Court, supra, 208 Cal.App.3d at p. 1134.)