Does a failure to appoint a director of a regional medical review unit to examine a developmentally disabled defendant violate due process law?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from The People v. J. A, C058895, No.JV121557 (Cal. App. 2010):

the proceeding does not violate due process of law. (See People v. Leonard, supra, 40 Cal.4th at pp. 1389 [trial court's failure to appoint the director of the regional center to examine a developmentally disabled defendant does not necessarily require reversal], 1391 [rejecting claim that the failure to appoint the regional director violated defendant's "rights under the federal Constitution to due process and a fair trial, as well as his Eighth Amendment right to a reliable guilt and penalty proceeding"].)3

Other Questions


In what circumstances will a court appoint a psychologist to examine a defendant who is developmentally disabled? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor cross-examining defendant's cross-examination of him violate the definition of a defendant's privilege? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have any grounds to argue that the Court's recent rulings in a civil case against the Defendant violated the Defendant's civil rights? (California, United States of America)
Can a prosecutor cross-examine a defendant's attorney's cross-examination of defendant on the basis that it was his own idea to lie and claim self-defense? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court's failure to hold a hearing on whether a defendant has the ability to pay assessments under the Government Code or Penal Code violate his due process and equal protection rights? (California, United States of America)
Does a failure to appoint a regional director constitute harmless error? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a claim that the trial court abused its discretion to treat Defendant as a "defendant" in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
Does a failure of instruction to require a jury to produce written findings by the jury regarding the aggravating factors found and considered in returning a death sentence violate a defendant's constitutional right to meaningful appellate review? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General's assertion that a denial of a motion on appeal by defendants on appeal violate their right to appeal against the denial of their motion violate their due process? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's right to due process violated when evidence of a witness's identification of that defendant is admitted? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.