Does a defendant have both a constitutional and statutory right to public trial?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Thompson, 266 Cal.Rptr. 309, 50 Cal.3d 134, 785 P.2d 857 (Cal. 1990):

7 A defendant has both a constitutional and a statutory right to public trial. (Cal. Const., art. I, 15; Pen.Code, 686, subd. 1.) Proceedings for the impanelment of the jury are included within the term "public trial." (People v. Teitelbaum (1958) 163 Cal.App.2d 184, 206, 329 P.2d 157.)

Other Questions


Is a defendant's claim that the trial court's failure to provide him with the means and subpoena witnesses to defend at trial a violation of his Sixth Amendment right to represent himself at trial reversible? (California, United States of America)
Under what circumstances will a federal criminal defendant be denied his right to exercise his constitutional right to a jury trial? (California, United States of America)
Does defendant's voluntary absence operate to waive his constitutional right to be present at trial and permitted continuation of the trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a defendant's claim that the exclusion of evidence in the trial of a defendant in a sexual assault case violated his federal constitutional right to present a defense? (California, United States of America)
If defendant has no right to present the evidence at trial, has he not established a violation of his right to a fair trial? (California, United States of America)
What waiver of appeal rights apply to a criminal defendant who knowingly waives any significant right such as constitutional rights? (California, United States of America)
Does defendant's voluntary absence operate to waive his constitutional right to be present at trial and permitted continuation of the trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a defendant's claim that he was denied his constitutional right to due process of law because the trial court relieved the prosecution of its burden of establishing that defendant acted with malice? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant knowingly waive his constitutional right to a jury trial in favour of a bench trial? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.