Is it appropriate to delay questioning on a Discovery examination?

Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada


The following excerpt is from Walsh v. TRA Company Limited, 2019 NLSC 168 (CanLII):

Further, Green, C.J. at paragraph 48 in Szeto v. Dwyer, 2010 NLCA 36 explains it will often make sense to save the questioning in respect to Discovery examinations until the parties have the opportunity to analyze the documentary record.

Other Questions


What is the test for granting leave to cross-examine the facts in both an affidavit and a Statement of Claim? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
Is there any adverse impact upon the integrity of the justice system as a result of delays in responding to inquiries respecting its intentions in light of the lateral transfer? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
Does the Crown have an obligation to cross-examine the accused before making the allegation? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
In a development agreement, is arbitration an appropriate mechanism for resolving disputes between the developer and the developer? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
Does the failure to cross-examine a witness on a specific issue tend to support an inference that the opposing party accepts the witness’ evidence on that specific issue? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
Can a subpoena be used as a disguised form of discovery? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
Does section 486.3(3) of the Rules of Civil Procedure apply to cross-examination? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
Can an appeal that raises "clearly arguable questions of law" be considered frivolous or vexatious? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
Can an application judge order a party to submit to a mental examination? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What is the legal framework for determining the appropriate standard of review? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.