When dealing with hypotheticals, it is not unusual for a plaintiff to be unable to point to a specific job opportunity and specific salary that is lost with the lost future capacity, or to be unable to point to a replacement lesser job opportunity that will be obtained with the plaintiff’s residual earning capacity. The court may make common sense inferences from the evidence as to the person’s capabilities and realistic job opportunities, in the absence of evidence as to a specific position and salary being available, see for example Tsalamandris v. McLeod, 2012 BCCA 239 at paras. 38–39.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.