Further, the plaintiff argues that the documents sought are relevant whether they pre- or post-date the manufacture of the DB9 or the accident. They rely on such decisions as Beazley v. Suzuki Motor Corporation, 2010 BCSC 681 for the propositions that: a) safety concerns, even about different vehicles, are relevant to the defendants’ state of the art defence, and b) evidence of subsequent redesign is relevant to whether the original design was safe.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.