Cost applications should, in most cases, require the principled application of a discretion that is based on a well established and well understood legal framework: Paskall v. Scheithauer, 2014 BCCA 26, leave to appeal to SCC refused on July 17, 2014 in 2014 CarswellBC 2058. Cost applications should not, in most instances, require the court to have to engage in a further fact-finding exercise or to engage in resolving additional questions of principle. Clear and unambiguous offers to settle will, of necessity, simplify cost applications.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.