In my view the trial judge fell into error when he dealt with such an award on that basis. The case law is very clear; a compensatory maintenance order is made to compensate for “economic disadvantage” – some economic loss the party may suffer, such as spouses giving up careers to look after homes, children, assist a spouse in establishing a business, etc. Economic disadvantage is the loss of a monetary amount. See Bollum v. Bollum, [1993] B.C.J. No. 1356 (Q.L.) (B.C.S.C.).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.