What is the standard of review at common law?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Bajwa v. British Columbia Veterinary Medical Association, 2010 BCSC 848 (CanLII):
It is settled law that the only two standards of judicial review at common law are correctness and reasonableness: Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick, 2008 SCC 9.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What are the standards of review applicable to a judicial review of a decision made under the Rules of Review Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of care required by common law by the common law under common law? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review applied by an appellate court reviewing a decision of a trial judge concerning matters of custody and access? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review for a judicial review of a decision of an adjudicator confirming a roadside driving prohibition? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the appropriate standard of review for an application for judicial review of patent unreasonableness? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review for an application for judicial review of a statutory tribunal? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the standard of review apply to a review of a Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal decision to which the decision was patently unreasonable? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the BCSC review the applicable standard of review apply to a point of law arising in interlocutory proceedings? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the common law common law obligation of a landowner at common law to do anything with regard to a natural watercourse? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review analysis on a judicial review application? (British Columbia, Canada)
