What is the test for a common law relationship?
Canada (Federal), Canada
The following excerpt is from B. G. v Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development, 2014 SSTAD 229 (CanLII):
For a common-law relationship to exist, the parties to the relationship must have a mutual intention of being in and continuing the relationship: Betts v. Shannon ibid. at paragraph 7.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for "common common law common common law" in a class action? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for a common law common law relationship? ("New York", United States of America)
What is the test for a common law common law judge to be bound by an opinion of the common law? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the common law right of citizen's arrest in common law? ("New York", United States of America)
How has the common law interpreted the doctrine of a fee under common law? ("New York", United States of America)
Can a tenant-in-common (tenant in common) claim exclusive possession of the property? ("New York", United States of America)
How have courts interpreted a new "common law" section of the Civil Code of Civil Procedure in the context of the common law? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a common law marriage valid in a state that does not recognize common law marriages? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can common intention be considered as determining the existence of a contractual relationship? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the test for establishing that a relationship does not exist merely because the parties choose to describe it as a relationship? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
