What is the equitable doctrine of unjust enrichment for common law partners?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Swaren v. Swaren, 2007 ABQB 193 (CanLII):

Courts address the inequity that would result from allowing one common law partner to assume all the benefit of the increase in value of family assets upon separation through the equitable doctrine of unjust enrichment. The application of equitable principles to common law partners follows the fundamental principles established in the jurisprudence relating to unjust enrichment generally: Peter v. Beblow, 1993 CanLII 126 (SCC), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 980 at para. 2.

Other Questions


Is a common law partner entitled to the property of their common-law partner? (Alberta, Canada)
In a common law common-law relationship, what is the test for calculating the equalization of benefits between spouses and their common law partners? (Alberta, Canada)
Does a statutory scheme directing the equal division of matrimonial property between the spouses of a common law husband and the common law spouse preclude equitable remedy? (Alberta, Canada)
Is there any common law common law concept or common law relation to corporate shields or corporate vale? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the unjust enrichment doctrine used in property disputes? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a common law wife entitled to use the term "common law husband" in the context of the common law husband? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a common law relationship result in unjust enrichment of the beneficiary of the domestic service? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for unjust enrichment for domestic services? (Alberta, Canada)
Does a common law spouse have to equal division of assets acquired by their common law spouses? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for the use of the needs factor in s.15.2(4) of the common law common law definition of a subsistence lifestyle? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.