What is the test for the use of the needs factor in s.15.2(4) of the common law common law definition of a subsistence lifestyle?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Johnston v. Johnston, 2005 ABQB 320 (CanLII):

According to Smith J. at para. 39, the needs factor in s. 15.2(4) has been defined at common law to be “a lifestyle which is reasonable and expected having regard to the parties’ station in life” (Riad v. Riad (2002), 317 A. R. 201, 2002 ABCA 254 at para. 33). Need is relative to the standard of living enjoyed by the couple prior to their separation. It does not necessarily equate to a subsistence lifestyle.

Other Questions


Is there any common law common law concept or common law relation to corporate shields or corporate vale? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a common law wife entitled to use the term "common law husband" in the context of the common law husband? (Alberta, Canada)
In a common law common-law relationship, what is the test for calculating the equalization of benefits between spouses and their common law partners? (Alberta, Canada)
What common law statement does a defendant need to prove his guilt? (Alberta, Canada)
Does a statutory scheme directing the equal division of matrimonial property between the spouses of a common law husband and the common law spouse preclude equitable remedy? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the common law common law duty of care owed by the City of Toronto to the developer and the developer? (Alberta, Canada)
Does a common law spouse have to equal division of assets acquired by their common law spouses? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances will the court be able to read in a new definition of the common-law spouse? (Alberta, Canada)
What factors have been considered in determining the value of matrimonial property in a common law relationship? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the common law and statutory common law rights of an employee who is terminated without cause? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.