Coleman v. Riches (1855), 16 C.B. 104, 139 E.R. 695, is authority for the proposition that a master is responsible for the fraud or negligence of his servant, but not for an act of wilful fraud or negligence done by him out of the scope of his authority or inconsistent with the course of his employment.
Get a full legal research memo!
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexsei.com.