How have particulars been interpreted in class actions?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Hoy v. Medtronic Inc., 2002 BCSC 1648 (CanLII):
Macaulay J. thereafter referred to the functions of particulars as enunciated in Cansulex Limited v. Perry: see para. 22(f) above. Implicit in those remarks is the recognition that class actions are subject to the same procedural safeguards as ordinary actions.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a class action settlement conditional on the payment of class counsel’s fees? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a plaintiff in a personal injury action commence an action against a defendant in the same action against the same defendant? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for adding plaintiffs to a proposed class action where the named and proposed representative plaintiff has no legitimate cause of action? (British Columbia, Canada)
What causes of action have been struck out of a class action for breach of section 61 of the Competition Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a class action proceeding preferable to an individual action proceeding? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for approval of a settlement in a class action action? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for representing a class in a class action? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a class action under the Class Proceedings Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for establishing that there was an identifiable class in the context of class action? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a court order that the names and addresses of class members who have opted out of a class action? (British Columbia, Canada)
