What is the test for having an objective finding of permanent pain?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Adams v. Taylor, 2013 ONSC 7920 (CanLII):
There is no requirement that there be objective findings to show permanence. It is well established that chronic pain will meet the requirement of permanence for the purposes of the threshold. (Tulloch v. Akogi (2007), 2007 CanLII 58408 (ON SC), 85 O.R. (3d) 793 (S.C.J.).)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When will the court make a finding of fact or finding of not finding fact in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for permanent pain in a motor vehicle accident? (Ontario, Canada)
Can an appellate court substitute a trial judge’s findings of fact or mixed findings of law with its own? (Ontario, Canada)
Is neck and scapular pain permanent? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review for findings of fact in a motion to appeal against a finding of unlawful imprisonment? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the legal test for overturning a finding of fact or finding of law? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a permanent injunction need to be issued if there has been a finding of defamation or a final judgment in defamation? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a finding of fact made on an interlocutory finding in a separate judicial proceeding engage in issue estoppel in a subsequent proceeding? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for finding a plaintiff liable for injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will a bank be able to clear a person's name clearing objective? (Ontario, Canada)
